SEC Releases Final Amendments to “Accredited Investor” and “Qualified Institutional Buyer” Definitions

SEC Releases Final Amendments to “Accredited Investor” and “Qualified Institutional Buyer” Definitions

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

On August 26, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to modernize the definitions of “accredited investor” and “qualified institutional buyer.” Both sets of amendments expand the list of eligible investors under these definitions.

For private fund managers, the “accredited investor” definition is the baseline threshold for offering interests in those funds. In the past, the sole criteria for individual investors were meeting either a net worth or income standard. The list of qualifying entities was quite limited. Metrics of sophistication were not considered at all.

On the flip side, funds themselves might have their investment activities limited to the extent that they were not “qualified institutional buyers,” more commonly referred to as QIBs.

The amendments allow individuals to qualify as accredited investors based on defined measures of professional knowledge, experience or certifications, in addition to the existing tests for net worth or income. The amendments also expand the list of entities that may qualify, including any entity that meets an investments-based test.

Highlights from these amendments are discussed below.

Accredited Investor Definition in Rule 501(a)

The amendments now include the following:

  • Individuals based on certain professional or educational certifications, designations or credentials, which the SEC may identify by order. Along with this amendment, the SEC deemed holders in good standing of the Series 7, Series 65 and Series 82 licenses as accredited investors. The SEC is empowered to revisit or add other qualifications going forward. We are surprised that the SEC did not specifically include Chartered Financial Analysts, which is a prevalent and hard-earned industry designation.
  • Similar to the “qualified client” definition for charging performance-based fees, individuals who are “knowledgeable employees” of the fund;
  • Limited liability companies with $5 million in assets;
  • Registered investment advisers (SEC or state), exempt reporting advisers and rural business investment companies (“RBICs”);
  • Any entity, including Indian [sic] tribes, governmental bodies, funds and entities organized under non-U.S. laws, that own “investments,” as defined in Rule 2a51-1(b) under the Investment Company Act, in excess of $5 million and that was not formed for the specific purpose of investing in the securities offered;
  • “Family offices” with at least $5 million in assets under management and their “family clients,” as each term is defined under the Investment Advisers Act.

Lastly, with respect to the income threshold for individuals, the term “spousal equivalent” is added so that all couples, regardless of traditional marital status, may pool their finances for the purpose of qualifying as accredited investors.

Qualified Institutional Buyer Definition in Rule 144A

The amendments now include the following:

  • Limited liability companies and RBICs if they meet the $100 million in securities owned and invested threshold; and
  • Any institutions that are accredited investors, not otherwise deemed QIBs (still subject to the $100 million threshold).

The amendments will take effect 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. The full release and fact sheet are available here. We would be happy to discuss the implications for your compliance policies and procedures and marketing processes.

 

Related Posts

Darren Mooney

Partner and Co-Head of Business Development

Darren Mooney is a Partner and the Co-Head of Business Development at Greyline. Before joining Greyline, Darren served as deputy chief compliance officer of Partner Fund Management where he held primary responsibility for the compliance program of the second-largest hedge fund in the Bay Area. Prior to that, Darren spent five years providing compliance consulting services at Cordium and then ACA Compliance Group, where he led the company’s San Francisco office and west coast operations. In addition to providing ongoing consulting services to a variety of investment managers, including hedge fund, private equity, venture capital, real estate, quantitative and other wealth managers, Darren also regularly guided clients through the SEC registration process, implemented tailored compliance programs, supported clients’ live SEC exams, and served as an SEC-mandated independent compliance consultant following an SEC enforcement action. Darren’s other experience includes serving as deputy chief compliance officer and associate counsel at F-Squared Investments where he directly supported the compliance program during the investigation and subsequent enforcement regarding historical advertising practices. Darren has a B.S. in Economics from the University of Delaware and a J.D. from Suffolk University Law School. He is a member of the Massachusetts bar.

Annie Kong

Partner and Head of Venture Capital
Annie Kong is a Partner and Head of the Venture Capital Division at Greyline. She provides ongoing compliance consulting to investment advisers and manages client relationships. Prior to joining Greyline, Annie was part of compliance and operations at a long-only manager-of-managers that advised pension fund clients. While there, she conducted compliance and operational due diligence on SEC-registered investment advisers on the platform. She also oversaw and counseled on various legal matters across the firm. Annie has a B.A. in Economics from the University of California, San Diego, and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law. She is an active member of the State Bar of California.
Greyline is pleased to announce that we are the recipient of the 2021 HFM U.S. Service Award in the Best Technology Firm – Newcomer category.